Plato’s Allegory of The Cave

What is an Allegory?

The word ‘allegory’ comes from the Latin ‘allegoria,’ meaning speaking to imply something else. Similar to metaphors, they illustrate an idea by making a comparison to something else in order to make an often much greater point. This technique is used as a means to separate the storyteller (or writer) from an idea that may be a polarizing topic to discuss directly.

The Allegory of The Cave is definitively one of the first “red pills” in my opinion to have ever been dropped on humanity. It was written in Book VII of ‘Plato’s The Republic’ and encourages the pupil to distinguish illusion from reality and perhaps also to “not shoot the messenger.” It examines the philosophical thought of truth, and how some with different experiences or backgrounds may perceive it and also how some may too respond when their notion of truth is challenged.

In Plato’s Story

He tells it as a dialogue between his brother Glaucon and Socrates. As presented by Plato, Socrates’s allegory of the cave imagines a group of people chained together inside an underground cave as prisoners who are stuck looking at a wall in which shadows are cast upon.

I won’t say anymore because I think it would be a great treat for you to watch this throwback video in which Orson Welles narrates the allegory for your enrichment and entertainment of course!


Allegory of The Cave
by Plato
Narrated by Orson Welles

Always support your local independent thinker! Like and share!

What is The Trusted News Initiative?

The past couple of years there has been a constant streamlining of the overall narrative coming from popular news sites and mainstream media, whether it’s from Facebook or Google or any major social media platform.

The fact of the matter is that this method of centralized information has nothing to do with the desire to protect the citizens from misinformation or disinformation but rather has more to do with controlling the masses themselves. It’s the proverbial take on Plato’s story of ‘The Cave.’

Another aspect that many have speculated is that controlling the information affects the monetary gain of these corporate oligarchs who during the pandemic experienced the most massive wealth transfer ever recorded in history! It’s well known they spend tons of money creating their own hype and manufacturing trends etc., so it comes as no surprise that they would manufacture news stories to create optics which place them in a favorable manner while the rest of civilization lives in a sort of ‘Truman Show’ mindscape. While they force lockdowns and people to “live” in the “meta verse.”

Needless to say, using the same consolidation of multiple media platforms (as discussed in the video) in order to divide & conquer by labeling any form of dissent or disagreement as harmful in order to silence and smear. All this is yet another method to control the masses by creating perpetual states of distrust between everyone who already is in a state of disarray due to the unprecedented actions taken by the government such as mandatory lockdowns, forced face masking and the mandatory vaccinations with genetic therapy drugs disguised as “vaccines.”

Keep in mind, the virus is still among us and many are no longer viewing the situation as a pandemic yet many elected officials in positions of power refuse to drop the ‘State of Emergency’ mostly because it does fit the “reset agenda” which can only truly take place in the USA if a governor has the hubris to act like a dictator pushing through legislation during these supposed ‘State of Emergency” as they capitalize on fear and ignorance of the citizens.

The video by the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation does an excellent job explaining The Trust News Inititive which is in reality a sophisticated propaganda campaign that suppresses the free flow of information. Information which any reasonable person has the right to hear and make their own decision on whether or not they chose to believe or prescribe to it. Check out their website and keep yourselves and your loved ones informed!

Please remember that if you like this post to like & share! Never forget to support your local independent thinker!

Beam me up, Scotty! A Look At Modern Hologram Technology.

HoloPortation Technology

David Nussbaum demonstrates Proto Inc. formerly PORTL Hologram’s technology. “Beam from anywhere to anywhere in real-time.”

In this clip from about two years ago he also shares how Jimmy Kimmel was able to attend an award show using this tech. It was convenient and entertaining to the audience who cheered as his hologram appeared on stage.

“If you are an educator or if you a politician or an inspirational speaker or a religious leader you can beam from the safety and security from your campaign headquarters or from your judge chambers or wherever you are into anywhere do you need to be in real-time”

– David Nussbaum.

The first time I became familiar with this hologram tech was when they had a concert and used this to recreate Tupac Shakur so that it may perform at Coachella. It seemed to impress people at the time but also raised questions about the industry stealing the likeness of artist who passed away in order to monetize from such a stunt. It does appear to be egregious that they would still own people even after death. Yet that is the case.

When I think of it, this type of technology may be heavily used in the future by those in positions of authority or influence. Many witnessed the Queen of England utilizing a similar hologram technology when celebrating the Platinum Jubilee. I am not sure if the same company Proto Inc. is responsible for her hologram but we can see that the government powers are using this technology to keep the public intrigued and their monarch in the safety of the palace.

British Monarch, Queen Elizabeth, using hologram technology during Platinum Jubilee celebration.

One can’t help but think that the current US administration may implement a similar use of this technology for the current geriatric (Joe Biden) in the office of President -who doesn’t seem to function all too well.

Then there is the entire “green climate agenda” as well as the “great reset” which both want to limit travel and isolate the public. When one thinks of the many ways they could convince people to limit social interaction by substituting it with hologram tech, there’s no doubt the world would love to participate in what seems to have been “pre-programmed” into our minds with films such as Star Wars and countless other sci-fi dramas.

The technology is beyond fascinating but at the same time, it can be another tool used by the powers that be to deceive the masses. There are so many ways one could think of how they could use it and also why they would use it. So my friends, never forget to question everything!

“Just A Clump of Cells” Totally Debunked

Nothing has been more persuasive or successful at convincing and even absolving would be parents of any guilt they may have felt from terminating an unwanted pregnancy than the outright lie which claims that preborn babies are “just a clump of cells.”

Watch video below:

In the early 1970’s Dr. Sacco’s iconic “precious feet” photo taken of a 10wk old preborn baby changed history by proving that children killed by abortion are not mere “clumps of cells.”

This idea of babies being a “clump of cells” has been the most common reasoning that many people use to justify the ending of a preborn infant’s life especially during the early weeks of conception and pregnancy, yet the photo taken by Dr. Sacco (and many others since) actually debunk that claim- it’s not just a clump of cells! It’s an actual living and growing human infant and this doctor proved it.

It’s okay to change your mind and repent.

Choose life. (John 3:16)

This video was used courtesy of Live Action: a pro-life and anti-abortion advocacy organization “..with the largest online presence in the pro-life movement, Live Action reaches millions of people each month with our eye-opening and life-saving content.”

Please Like & Share!

🗣MONOPOLY – Who Owns The World?

Documentary by Tim Gielen

A brilliant documentary by filmmaker Tim Gielen reveals how a small group of super rich criminals have been buying virtually everything on earth, until they own it all.

From media, health care, travel, food industry, governments… All which allows them to control the whole world including average citizens as these same groups of powerful individuals influence politicians and other organizations.

Because of this they are trying to impose the New World Order.”

Who are they one may ask?

Look no further than the usual suspects;

Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, George Soros…

For more information click 👉HERE!

Remember to Please Like, Share & Subscribe!!

The Ethical Skeptic: Disinformation vs Misinformation

A deep dive into terms that have been tossed around profusely as of late, perhaps you may have heard of them?

Disinformation” and “misinformation.”

This is a fascinating read that gives sophisticated context and definition to terms being used by many within the media and political spheres yet not truly understood by the public at large.

These terms effectively work to influence and generate [emotional] responses from the masses but really functions as methods to promote the lack of trust and fomenting of discord -which will inevitably lead to the breakdown of society.

Remember that an already demoralized public lacking trust and unity amongst themselves, the citizens, and for their governing bodies can & will be easily misled by whichever entities or corporations who can fund the most effective propaganda campaigns against them.

The best way to combat such massive propaganda and subversion is to educate oneself to the methods and language used in such intelligence operations.

As the ancient Chinese Philosopher and General said famously, “know thy enemy, know thyself.”

To stay a few steps ahead of the information warfare heaped upon us we have to be able to confront the uncomfortable truths and adapt mentally in order to avoid being deceived and forced asleep by all the massive deception & coercion currently taking place.

Below is a portion of the article which states;

“The social definitions of misinformation and disinformation suffer Wittgenstein Contextual Error. They are disinformation themselves. One should notice that, despite an expansion of such terminology and knowledge, nonetheless people grow more ignorant and gullible each decade. This is exactly how disinformation works.

The 10% lie is much more effective than the 100% one. While misinformation deals in lies, disinformation deals in facts. ‘Fact-checking’ therefore, is a favorite pretense of the disinformant.”

To continue reading the article and enjoy how fundamentally it breaks down these terms and even exposes how fact checkers themselves are merchants of disinfo please click here!!

***ALSO Click here for more good reading from The Ethical Skeptic!

Remember to LIKE and SHARE!!

‘Ukraine On Fire’ MUST WATCH FILM – Censored On YouTube! Watch now!

Ukraine on Fire, an Oliver Stone film.

Here is how Oliver Stone describes this film, below:

“Ukraine. Across its eastern border is Russia and to its west-Europe. For centuries, it has been at the center of a tug-of-war between powers seeking to control its rich lands and access to the Black Sea. 2014’s Maidan Massacre triggered a bloody uprising that ousted president Viktor Yanukovych and painted Russia as the perpetrator by Western media.

But was it? 

“Ukraine on Fire” by Igor Lopatonok provides a historical perspective for the deep divisions in the region which lead to the 2004 Orange Revolution, 2014 uprisings, and the violent overthrow of democratically elected Yanukovych. Covered by Western media as a people’s revolution, it was in fact a coup d’état scripted and staged by nationalist groups and the U.S. State Department. 

Investigative journalist Robert Parry reveals how U.S.-funded political NGOs and media companies have emerged since the 80s replacing the CIA in promoting America’s geopolitical agenda abroad.”

Who is Oliver Stone?

Well, it is known that Oliver Stone is not shy about his opinions or criticism of the United States and it’s many administrations who have seemed to have foreign policy that hardly ever benefits it’s citizens or the citizens of other countries.

Here at RedPillsOnly we do try to be as reality and faceted based as possible but ultimately want the reader to come to their own conclusions. Links have been provided for Oliver Stone’s Wikipedia here and an article from The Guardian from a few years back as well as an article from The American Conservative which all give a well rounded perspective of him as a filmmaker and his political leanings.

I think this film is a must see if one wants to get a better perspective of what exactly is happening in the Ukraine and Russia and how USA was involved. It also will help us as free thinkers assess if it’s worth the risk.

I hope you enjoy this post and PLEASE REMEMBER to comment and share with others!

Peace & God Bless!

Mürdėr By Injēctìön – Throwback Intervïēw

In the above video recorded over three decades ago for what seems to be a local media outlet- Mr. Mullins discusses his intensive research into the American medical establishment and exposes the massive amount of fraud and corruption which was occurring since its very inception.

With what is currently happening in the world regarding the COVID-19 virus, it’s clear to see that Author & Researcher, Eustace Mullins, was definitely ahead of his time and even sounding the alarm back then!

He goes into details of how the Rockefeller and Carnegie oligarchs came together to create the medical system we now have and how it has proved to be a disservice to the public because of the awful greed which is now entrenched within the system causing the patients dependent upon care to be looked upon as merely “profits.”

Nevertheless, I do hope you take the time out to watch the video and draw your own conclusions! This man did years of research in the Library of Congress and he has receipts! So when you’re finished watching the video consider also purchasing his actual book ‘Murder By Injection’ because this interview only scratched the surface.

I have purchased and read this book and I am still reeling at the amount of corruption that was not only involved in establishing the current system of American medicine but resolute that these entities need much oversight and accountability for the damage they cause.

Please remember to Like & Share! Spreading good information while we still have the opportunity is so important especially now with the censorship! Every bit of it helps to wake more people up and change things for the betterment of humanity!

🚨How to combat ‘Mass formation hypnosis?’

In this brief report, Greg Reese breaks down what exactly happens when a society falls into the grasp of a totalitarian gøvernment stāte and what every individual can do in order to resist the onslaughts of psychological operations to end their tyranny.

Credit: Greg Reese/Reese Repørt

Follow Greg Reese on Telegram

Find more exclusive content on FreeWorldNews.TV and help spread the word! Remember to Like & Share.

Only You Can Break The Algorithm With Truth!!

Dr. Joseph Mercola – How Chïna Controls Your Cøvïd Life

It’s quite evident that the kind of society the technocratic elites are pushing us all toward is one that emulates China: one where lip service is paid to human rights while the population is held in an iron grip of high-tech surveillance.

China’s authoritarian-style rule is something artist and freedom activist Ai Weiwei is deeply familiar with. In a November 12, 2021, interview with PBS “Firing Line,” (above)1 Weiwei discussed his struggles with the Chinese government, which he also reveals in his memoir, “A Thousand Years of Joys and Sorrows.”

After years of political persecution, Weiwei escaped China in 1981 and ended up in New York City. In 1989, a peaceful protest in Tiananmen Square turned bloody, as the Chinese military slaughtered many of those in attendance. Several were friends of Weiwei’s. In his book, he writes:2

“Young people in China today have no knowledge at all of the student protests in Tiananmen Square in 1989, and if they knew they might not even care, for they learn submission before they have developed an ability to raise doubts and challenge assumptions.”

“How has the Chinese government succeeded in erasing that memory?” the interviewer asks. Weiwei responds:3

“The Chinese government is very sophisticated. They succeed in every way [with] propaganda. They believe if they keep presenting the untruthful conclusion, history will also write it that way.

[The] young generation, they have no way to even to raise the question or challenge this conclusion from the government. So basically, the whole generation, or generations — the Chinese majority — will be on the side of the government, which is a pity …

They know how to control the internet. They hired probably millions of internet police to just watch every sentence. So, every move, every act on the internet would be clearly recorded …

It [became] so sophisticated, censoring and monitoring every individual. And it’s beyond imagination … many, many dissidents have been put in jail. Most of my friends are still serving in jail now.”

US Is Already an Authoritarian State

Today, as we struggle against government COVID propaganda, the effectiveness of this kind of totalitarian brainwashing is becoming clear. There’s no doubt we’re in the most sophisticated war in the history of mankind, and anyone capable of rational thought and an inkling toward freedom is the designated enemy.

Everywhere you look, officials are spewing easily provable lies, yet mainstream media run with it, and large numbers of people swallow this information without a second thought.

It’s not hard to imagine a future where the population is so grossly misinformed about the basics of science and medicine that there’s no one left to even consider questioning the narrative handed to them. As noted by Weiwei, we’re already well on our way:4

“Certainly, in the United States, with today’s condition, you can easily have an authoritarian [ruler]. In many ways, you are already in the authoritarian state. You just don’t know it. Many things happening today in the U.S. can be compared to the Cultural Revolution in China — like people trying to be unified in a certain political correctness. That is very dangerous.”

Media Enforced Falsehoods

Ashley Rindsberg, author of “The Gray Lady Winked: How the New York Times’ Misreporting, Distortions and Fabrications Radically Alter History,” dissects the news coverage of SARS-CoV-2’s origin in her Tablet magazine piece, “The Lab Leak Fiasco.” In it, she suggests China is largely behind the unscientific denial of the lab leak theory. She writes:5

“For over a year the media enforced falsehoods about the pandemic’s origins, never evaluated the evidence, never apologized, and was never held accountable … Jan. 24, 2020, British peer-reviewed journal The Lancet published a study6 on the novel coronavirus it identified as 2019-nCoV.

The study substantially contradicted the official Chinese government narrative about when and how the virus originated … While the Chinese government had pointed to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market … the paper found that at least one-third of initial cases — including ‘patient zero’ … — had no connection to the market whatsoever.”

Initial news coverage criticized the Chinese government’s handling of the crisis and questioned the narrative coming from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Then, at the very end of January 2021, the tide suddenly shifted. U.S. Sen. Tom Cotton was ferociously attacked for stating that:7

“We still don’t know where the coronavirus originated. Could have been a market, a farm, a food processing company. I would note that Wuhan has China’s only biosafety level 4 super laboratory that works with the world’s most deadly pathogens to include, yes, coronavirus.”

By mid-February, mainstream media were referring to the lab leak theory as fake news and an unfounded racist conspiracy theory that wasn’t even worthy of consideration, let alone investigation.

In her article, Rindsberg details how mainstream media created a “bioweapons straw man,” conflating the accidental lab leak theory, which had relatively widespread support and plenty of evidence, with the theory that SARS-CoV-2 was a bioweapon, which very few, and certainly not Cotton, were claiming at the time.

“What accounted for the speed of the media’s about-face?” Rindsberg asks. One possibility is widespread antagonism against the GOP among mainstream reporters and editors.

“Yet blind partisanship alone couldn’t have guaranteed a rapid, simultaneous, and near-unanimous change in coverage,” Rindsberg writes.8 “There was something else.”

China’s Influence Over Global Media

That “something else” is China, which wields undeniable influence over American business, including news media and entertainment. As noted by Rindsberg, there’s “an awareness that when the CCP bares its teeth, or, if necessary, goes on the attack, it can alter the fortunes of billion-dollar companies, thousands of employees, and millions of shareholders …”

Even a corporate behemoth like Amazon is not immune to the CCP’s power. According to Rindsberg, half of the top 10,000 sellers on Amazon are in China, so the CCP could easily throttle Amazon’s profits simply by restricting access to those vendors. Amazon is owned by Jeff Bezos, who also owns The Washington Post, one of several news outlets that suddenly turned coat-tails and disparaged the lab leak theory as a fringe conspiracy.

The CCP has also strategically invested in media companies around the world, giving it the ability to sway coverage to its advantage more directly. “The list of major U.S. media companies with substantial ties to China is so long that it is … difficult to name one that isn’t dependent in one way or another on Chinese cash,” Rindsberg writes.

Scientists Have Other Incentives Too

Some of the scientists involved in dangerous gain-of-function research, the kind suspected of having spawned SARS-CoV-2, are also beholden to China. But beside that, they’re also incentivized to discredit the lab leak theory in general, regardless of where the lab might be situated, as their careers would be lost if gain-of-function research were to be banned.

Not surprisingly, people involved in some of the riskiest research of this kind don’t want anyone to suspect their work might produce a global killer. A prime example is EcoHealth Alliance president Peter Daszak,9 who was subcontracting coronavirus gain-of-function research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. February 19, 2020, 27 scientists published a letter in The Lancet,10 condemning “conspiracy theories” that suggest COVID-19 has an unnatural origin.

In mid-September 2021, it was finally revealed that the letter had been cooked up by Daszak, and 26 of the 27 signatories had ties to the Wuhan lab. In the meantime, however, Daszak had been “uncritically interviewed, cited or tapped as a talking head” by a long list of legacy media, Rindsberg notes.

Everywhere he went, he preached the natural, zoonotic origin theory. According to Daszak, the virus jumped from animal to human, most likely a bat. He also stressed that the pandemic was a direct outgrowth of mankind’s greedy encroachment on nature. This is a talking point straight out of The Great Reset agenda, to which the Green New Deal belongs.

“With Daszak leading the way, the media successfully couched lab leak as a conspiracy theory with roots in Trumpian politics, environmental denialism and anti-Chinese sentiment,” Rindsberg writes.11

“Together, these formed what we might call Daszak’s triangle, a mental model that made lab leak a social and political impossibility for anyone who did not want to be branded as an anti-science, right-wing xenophobe.”

Brutal Authoritarianism Hailed as Success Model

Daszak was also a staunch defender of China’s research on zoonotic viruses with human emergence potential in general. “The media enthusiastically embraced this notion as it reported on China as a global model for fighting the pandemic and handling major crises more generally,” Rindsberg says.

And that brings us back to where we started. U.S. media have glorified China as a role model for how to “win” the war against the virus. The fact that this “safety” has come at the price of freedom is something the media have skirted almost entirely.

Indeed, many have opined that people shouldn’t expect to have human rights during a pandemic such as this. CNN’s Don Lemon openly suggested the unvaccinated should be banned from grocery stores12 — an inhumane suggestion of such epic proportions, many couldn’t believe their ears, yet this is happening today in India.13

Indeed, banning the unvaccinated from society, including removing some of the most basic rights, is underway by governments around the world, to varying degrees — all for an illness that has killed just .012% of the population and 1% of those infected.14,15

War of Words

And let’s not forget that the reason a pandemic could be declared and combated with gene-based therapies in the first place is because basic definitions were altered. Reality didn’t change. Science didn’t change. Medical knowledge didn’t change. Only words did, and based on altered verbiage alone all sorts of falsehoods have been promoted. 

As just one example, a “vaccine” has since its inception been known as a product that protects you from disease by producing immunity (even if only temporary).16 That definition has now changed to a product that stimulates an immune response against a given disease.17

This definition was obviously contrived to describe the limited function of the COVID-19 gene therapy injections, which do not make you immune and can’t prevent you from getting or spreading the infection. By any definition of a vaccine in use before 2021, the COVID shot is not a vaccine.

At best, the shot will reduce your symptoms. This also means they cannot, ever, produce herd immunity. This despite the redefinition of herd immunity, from being something produced as a result of natural infection, to something resulting from mass-vaccination.

Trust in Media ‘Damaged Beyond Repair’

So, why did media turn against the lab leak theory? As noted by Rindsberg, “Which theory is more likely — lab leak or zoonotic spillover — is … the key question for science. The question for the media is why it chose sides so quickly, so vigorously and so collectively, before there was enough evidence either way.” The answer, Rindsberg argues, goes back to China’s influence over American business, science and media.

As evidence she cites a May 27, 2021, article in Nature,18 which stated that “rhetoric around an alleged lab leak has grown so toxic that it’s fueling online bullying of scientists and anti-Asian harassment in the United States, as well as offending researchers and authorities in China whose cooperation is needed” — the key sentence there being “offending researchers and authorities in China.”

“In these few words — more ham-fisted but also more revealing than anything you’d find in a leading consumer news outlet — Nature drew back the curtain on not just the connection the media drew between lab leak and racism, but the media’s broader take on the role that China played in the pandemic,” Rindsberg writes.19

“While this might explain the false narrative that emerged about lab leak in the science media, it still leaves us wondering why the consumer news media took much the same approach.

This question is at the core of what might be one of the greatest journalistic scandals of our generation. That there appears to be no accountability, self-reflection, or Iraq-WMD-style reckoning on the horizon only compounds the problem.

If and when it does, we are likely to conclude that the false narrative around the pandemic’s origins represented a tipping point — a comprehensive failure in journalistic quality and mores … We might also discover that public trust in an institution essential to democracy was damaged beyond repair.”

Global Totalitarianism Modeled on the CCP

To go back to where we started, Weiwei stated in his interview:20

“In China, we have a saying: ‘To deal with anything, you have to be strong yourself.’ I don’t think the West is strong enough themselves to deal with China … I don’t think the U.S. has the ability to really examine the situation of its own moral and [ethical] behavior.”

Where does that leave us? It’s now undeniable that the U.S. is becoming more totalitarian by the day, and many of the incoming changes to society are patterned after the CCP’s iron rule, with round-the-clock digital surveillance, a punishing social credit score and draconian censorship system, the likes of which Americans cannot even fathom. Even the smallest dissenter is hunted down and punished.

People who grow up under this kind of regime will never know anything else. They’ll accept it as a condition of life. Is that what you want for your children and grandchildren? If not, there’s no time to waste. You have to speak out against and peacefully resist anything and everything that brings us closer to that end.

Speaking Out Is the Most Important Thing We Can Do

Importantly, as explained by Mattias Desmet,21 professor of clinical psychology at Ghent University in Belgium, totalitarianism differs from dictatorships in that totalitarian regimes commit their worst atrocities once dissenting voices have been silenced.

‘In my opinion, it is not an option to stop speaking,’ Desmet says. ‘It’s the most important thing we can do.’ ~ Professor Mattias Desmet

By keeping the pressure on, by vocalizing dissent, many planned horrors can be kept at bay. By speaking out and uniting in the fight for freedom we also provide those who otherwise would simply go along with the program, for fear of being ostracized, a better alternative. They can join the resistance rather than joining those who are trying to destroy society as we know it and take away our freedoms.

“In my opinion, it is not an option to stop speaking,” Desmet says. “It’s the most important thing we can do.” We also need to create parallel structures — businesses, organizations, technologies, movements and creative pursuits that fit within a totalitarian society while being morally outside of it. Once enough parallel structures are created, a parallel culture is born that functions as a sanctuary of sanity within the totalitarian world.

According to Desmet, totalitarianism will always self-destruct in the end. The psychological underpinnings are so self-destructive that the system ends up killing its own. That’s the good news. The bad news is a totalitarian system can survive for long periods of time before petering out, and there tend to be few survivors at the end.

That said, Desmet believes this new global totalitarianism is more unstable than regional dictator-led totalitarian systems, so it may self-destruct faster. So, the key is to survive outside the totalitarian system while we patiently resist it and wait for its self-destruction.

This analysis was originally written on by Dr. Joseph Mercola and can be viewed by clicking this Link. To learn more about Dr. Joseph Mercola, please click here.

If you appreciate this content please share!

Thank you!